Dear Bono....

     You're meeting with the wrong people


endpoverty@dearbono.com

  • Home
  • A LETTER TO BONO
  • About Us
  • How do we end extreme poverty?Click to open the How do we end extreme poverty? menu
    • Dear Bono Summary
    • Who has the power?
  • Who are the press councils?Click to open the Who are the press councils? menu
    • What is a press council?
    • Examples of news omission upheld by the press councils
    • Examples of news omission dismissed by the press councils
  • How can I help?Click to open the How can I help? menu
    • How do I make my complaint?
    • Where do I send my complaint?
  • FAQ
  • NEWSClick to open the NEWS menu
    • Extreme Poverty (Feb-March)
    • Press Councils (Feb-March)
  • Dear BonoClick to open the Dear Bono menu
    • 1. Who are the press councils?
    • 2. Why do press councils allow news omission?
    • 3. Why do we keep ignoring extreme poverty?
    • 4. What is the difference between censorship and omission?
    • 5. What did the GFC do for extreme poverty?
    • 6. What the Boxing Day Tsunami taught us
    • 7. What 9/11 taught us
    • 8. News omission cases upheld by the press councils
    • 9. Why people are idiots
    • 10. Why people are kind
    • 11. Examples of news omission the press councils have dismissed
    • 12. What are our motivations for change?
    • 13. Why advocacy journalism will work
    • 14. Our roles in ending extreme poverty
    • 15. Embarking on a war on extreme poverty
    • 16. Who are the real medicine men?
    • 17. A conclusion
  • CODES OF CONDUCTClick to open the CODES OF CONDUCT menu
    • Australia
    • Austria
    • Azerbaijan
    • Belgium
    • Bosnia and Herzegovina
    • Bulgaria
    • Burkina Faso
    • Canada
    • Chile
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Fiji
    • Finland
    • France
    • Georgia
    • Germany
    • Ghana
    • Guinea
    • Hong Kong
    • Iceland
    • India
    • Indonesia
    • Israel
    • Italy
    • Japan
    • Kenya
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Macedonia
    • Mali
    • Malaysia
    • Malta
    • Nepal
    • Netherlands
    • New Zealand
    • Nigeria
    • Norway
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Peru
    • Philippines
    • Portugal
    • Russia
    • Singapore
    • Slovak Republic
    • Slovenia
    • South Africa
    • South Korea
    • Spain
    • Sri Lanka
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
    • Tanzania
    • Togo
    • Tonga
    • Turkey
    • Ukraine
    • United Kingdom
    • United States
    • World Press Councils
  • Contact Us

World Press Councils

International Principles of Professional Ethics in Journalism

Issued by the Consultative Club of International and Regional Organizations of Journalists in Paris in November 1983.

Preamble

International and regional organizations of professional journalists, representing altogether 400,000 working journalists in all parts of the world, have held since 1978 consultative meetings under the auspices of UNESCO. [1]

The second consultative meeting (Mexico City, 1980) expressed its support for the UNESCO Declaration on Fundamental Principles concerning the Contribution of the Mass Media to strengthening Peace and International Understanding, to the Promotion of Human Rights and to Countering Racialism, Apartheid, and Incitement to War. Moreover, the meeting adopted the "Mexico Declaration" with a set of principles which represent common grounds of existing national and regional codes of journalistic ethics as well as relevant provisions contained in various international instruments of a legal nature.

The fourth consultative meeting (Prague and Paris, 1983) noted the lasting value of the UNESCO Declaration in which it is stated inter alia that "the exercise of freedom of opinion, expression and information, recognized as an integral part of human rights and fundament freedoms, is a vital factor in the strengthening of peace and international understanding." Furthermore, the meeting recognized the important role which information and communication play in the contemporary world, both in national and international spheres, with a growing social responsibility being placed upon the mass media and journalists.

On this basis the following principles of professional ethics in journalism were prepared as an international common ground and as a source of inspiration for national and regional codes of ethics. This set of principles is intended to be promoted autonomously by each professional organization through ways and means most adequate to its members.

Principle I: People's right to true information

People and individuals have the right to acquire an objective picture of reality by means of accurate and comprehensive information as well as to express themselves freely through the various media of culture and communication.

Principle II: The journalist's dedication to objective reality

The foremost task of the journalist is to serve the people's right to true and authentic information through an honest dedication to objective reality whereby facts are reported conscientiously in their proper context, pointing out their essential connections and without causing distortions, with due deployment of the creative capacity of the journalist, so that the public is provided with adequate material to facilitate the formation of an accurate and comprehensive picture of the world in which the origin, nature and essence of events, processes and state of affairs are understood as objectively as possible.

Principle III: The journalist's social responsibility

Information in journalism is understood as a social good and not as a commodity, which means that the journalist shares responsibility for the information transmitted and is thus accountable not only to those controlling the media but ultimately to the public at large, including various social interests. The journalist's social responsibility requires that he or she will act under all circumstances in conformity with a personal ethical consciousness.

Principle IV: The journalist's professional integrity

The social role of the journalist demands that the profession maintain high standards of integrity, including the journalist's right to refrain from working against his or her conviction or from disclosing sources of information as well as the right to participate in the decision-making of the medium in which he or she is employed. The integrity of the profession does not permit the journalist to accept any form of bribe or the promotion of any private interest contrary to the general welfare. Likewise, it belongs to professional ethics to respect intellectual property and, in particular, to refrain from plagiarism.

Principle V: Public access and participation

The nature of the profession demands that the journalist promote access by the public to information and participation of the public in the media, including the right of correction or rectification and the right of reply.

Principle VI: Respect for privacy and human dignity

An integral part of the professional standards of the journalists is respect for the right of the individual to privacy and human dignity, in conformity with provisions of international and national law concerning protection of the rights and the reputation of others, prohibiting libel, calumny, slander and defamation.

Principle VII: Respect for public interest

The professional standards of the journalist prescribe due respect for the national community, its democratic institutions and public morals.

Principle VIII: Respect for universal values and diversity of cultures

A true journalist stands for the universal values of humanism, above all peace, democracy, human rights, social progress and national liberation, while respecting the distinctive character, value and dignity of each culture, as well as the right of each people freely to choose and develop its political, social, economic and cultural systems. Thus the journalist participates actively in social transformation towards democratic betterment of society and contributes through dialogue to a climate of confidence in international relations conducive to peace and justice everywhere, to détente, disarmament and national development. It belongs to the ethics of the profession that the journalist be aware of relevant provisions contained in international conventions, declarations and resolutions.

Principle IX: Elimination of war and other great evils confronting humanity

The ethical commitment to the universal values of humanism calls for the journalist to abstain from any justification for, or incitement to, wars of aggression and the arms race, especially in nuclear weapons, and all other forms of violence, hatred or discrimination, especially racialism and apartheid, oppression by tyrannic regimes, colonialism and neocolonialism, as well as other great evils which afflict humanity, such as poverty, malnutrition and diseases. By so doing, the journalist can help eliminate ignorance and misunderstanding among peoples, make nationals of a country sensitive to the needs and desires of others, ensure respect for the rights and dignity of all nations, all peoples and all individuals without distinction of race, sex, language, nationality, religion or philosophical conviction.

Principle X: Promotion of a new world information and communication order

The journalist operates in the contemporary world within the framework of a movement towards new international relations in general and a new information order in particular. The new order, understood as an integral part of the New International Economic Order, is aimed at the decolonisation and democratization of information and communication, both nationally and internationally, on the basis of peaceful coexistence among peoples and with full respect for their cultural identity. The journalist has a special obligation to promote the process of democratization of international relations in the field of information, in particular by safeguarding and fostering peaceful and friendly relations among states and peoples.

 

[1] The following organizations participated: International Organization of Journalists (IOJ), International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), International Catholic Union of the Press (UCIP), Latin American Federation of Journalists (FELAP), Latin American Federation of Press Workers (FELATRAP), Federation of Arab Journalists (FAJ), Union of African Journalists (UAJ), and Confederation of Asean Journalists (CAJ). The IFJ did not attend the conclusive meeting of this process in Paris, 20 November 1983, which issued the document.

 

IFJ Declaration of Principles on the Conduct of Journalists

Adopted by the Second World Congress of the International Federation of Journalists at

Bordeaux

in April 1954 and amended by the 18th IFJ World Congress in Helsingör in June 1986.

This international Declaration is proclaimed as a standard of professional conduct for journalists engaged in gathering, transmitting, disseminating and commenting on news and information in describing events.

  1. Respect for truth and for the right of the public to truth is the first duty of the journalist.
  2. In pursuance of this duty, the journalist shall at all times defend the principles of freedom in the honest collection and publication of news, and of the right of fair comment and criticism.
  3. The journalist shall report only in accordance with facts of which he/ she knows the origin. The journalist shall not suppress essential information or falsify documents.
  4. The journalist shall use only fair methods to obtain news, photographs and documents.
  5. The journalist shall do the utmost to rectify any published information which is found to be harmfully inaccurate.
  6. The journalist shall observe professional secrecy regarding the source of information obtained in confidence.
  7. The journalist shall be aware of the danger of discrimination being furthered by the media, and shall do the utmost to avoid facilitating such discrimination based on, among other things, race, sex, sexual orientation, language, religion, political or other opinions, and national or social origins.
  8. The journalist shall regard as grave professional offences the following:
      - plagiarism;
      - malicious misrepresentation;
      - calumny, slander, libel, unfounded accusations;
      - the acceptance of a bribe in any form in consideration of either publication or suppression.
  9. Journalists worthy of the name shall deem it their duty to observe faithfully the principles stated above. Within the general law of each country the journalist shall recognize in professional matters the jurisdiction of colleagues only, to the exclusion of every kind of interference by governments or others.

 

Press Foundation of Asia
Reporting Ethnic Tensions

The principles below evolved out of a nine-nations journalism conference conducted by the Press Foundation of Asia in Davao City, April 1970.

  1. Factual accuracy in a single story is no substitute for the total truth. A single story which is factually accurate can nonetheless be misleading.
  2. Prejudice may sell newspapers but newspapers should resist the temptation to exploit human fears for commercial gains.
  3. In mixed societies, editors should be aware of the danger of feeding by selective reporting, common prejudicial stereotypes about groups. Generalisations based on the behaviour of an individual or a small number of individuals are invariably unjust.
  4. When there is potential for communal tension, there should be a constant effort to investigate and expose the underlying causes.
  5. Statistics can be used to excite passion. It should always be checked and interpreted.
  6. All stories of communal, racial or religious nature should be scrupulously ascribed to their source. The authority of the source should be properly evaluated.
  7. Advertisement of an unfair discriminating nature should not be accepted.
  8. Editors have a responsibility for the tone and truth of the letters' column.
  9. Harm can be done by distortion in translation, especially in areas where several languages are spoken. Words and phrases may have different connotations among different groups.
  10. It should be recognised that editorial comment, however benign, does not necessarily compensate for the harm done by a misleading news report.
  11. Journalists should always use cool and moderate language, especially in headlines and also in display. No concession should be made to rhetoric. Lurid and gory details and emotive reference to past history should be avoided.
  12. In mixed societies where extra-territorial loyalties are often alleged and are a cause of tension, great care should be taken about stories imputing interference by a foreign power unless it is clearly established.
  13. The traditional newspaper standards of checking for accuracy should be applied with even greater rigour in any stories involving racial, religious or communal groups. Statements should not be accepted at face value from any source, including official ones, and where necessary, these should be accompanied in the news columns by corroboration and interpretation.
  14. Unverified runour is not the proper content of news columns especially when there is great danger in speculation about violence.
  15. When there is violence, particular care should be taken about publication of the first incidents.
  16. Every effort should be made to portray ethnic groups in other than conflict situations.
  17. When violence has broken out, the role of government in the supply of information is crucial. There must be a continuous supply of information from this source to prevent rumour, speculation and needless panic. In these circumstances, a close working relationship between the Press and the Government is essential and there should be no division of interest.
  18. Casualty figures can cause chain reactions, and experience has shown that official figures may be under or over estimated.
  19. Pictures can distort reality. An unrepresentative picture may lie even more than a news story and add to prejudices.
  20. Journalists, particularly foreign correspondents, should not report crises without a sufficient understanding of the background of events and trends.
  21. In newspaper groups publishing in different languages, care should be taken that they speak with the same voice on explosive issues and in times of tension. The cumulative effect of differing coverage and opinion is deadly.
  22. In mixed societies with underlying causes of tension - social, economic or religious - newspapers and the broadcast media should initiate investigative and interpretative stories with sociological content. These would spread understanding and also help disperse an environment of resentment and suspicion which can turn a minor incident into a riot.

The Eastern Caribbean Press Council Mission


The Eastern Caribbean Press Council (ECPC) is a body created by a group of newspapers in the Eastern Caribbean (Anguilla, Antigua, Barbados, British Virgin lslands, Dominica, Grenada, Montserrat, St. Kitts-Nevis, St. Lucia, and St. Vincent) for a common goal:

  • to practice self-regulation and thereby curb excesses in the Press;
  • to observe high ethical standards and take the benchmark of journalism to a higher level. 



These newspapers have agreed to the appointment of a 7-member council which will investigate complaints against the Press. The reader will therefore have an avenue for redress of any breach of the Code of Practice for Caribbean Journalists. The code was developed by Caribbean editors and publishers. 

The nature of complaints involves such matters as alleged bias, dishonesty, distortion and falsification. These are mainly in news stories.

The Codes of Practice of various councils require publications to exercise care not to publish inaccurate. misleading or distorted information. Where the Council believes such information has been published, the code requires editors to correct it promptly. Also apologies should be published where appropriate.

The ECPC is an independent and professional body with a grave responsibility to help both the public and the media and also to bring about a harmonious relationship between these two parties. 

All complaints must be made in writing and must be signed by the complainant with relevant information like address, telephone, fax number or e-mail address. This is recommended because it presents a permanent record of the complaint and the nature of it. It reduces the incidence of changing the complaint, thereby eliminating frivolous complaints, irrelevant complaints or groundless complaints. Only in exceptional cases will complaints be entertained verbally.

 Copyright 2009 Dear Bono. All rights reserved.

Web Hosting by Yahoo!


endpoverty@dearbono.com